Carnival of Crime

Weapons seized at 2015 Notting Hill Carnival E. Standard

Southend-on-Sea Carnival boasts one of the largest processions in Europe its sixty garish floats attracting about 20,000 people. Strangely there’s never any mention of it on the news. For the BBC it doesn’t exist, no more significant than the average English summer fete going on somewhere in white middle England.

For the press it’s not news worthy as no one who goes there is expected to die a violent death by stabbing or kicks to the head. It doesn’t require a massive police presence and no officer of the law is routinely attacked with bricks, broken bottles, acid or knives. But chiefly it gets no attention because almost all the participants and certainly the organising committee are white. As such they have no obvious identity, if any identity at all and tick no socially required boxes.

The Notting Hill Carnival in contrast, extolled every year by the BBC as the ‘biggest Carnival in Europe,’ receives attention on the national news just for its existence, not for the twenty eight policemen who were attacked with bottles, blood and acidic substances. The news broadcasts didn’t mention it, but there were 313 arrests mostly relating to drugs and offensive weapons, and fourteen for sexual offences against women. The number of knives confiscated was slightly down on last year but the attacks on police were so bad that Met Police Federation Chairman, Ken Marsh MBE did feel obliged to comment to the press:

‘What other event would be allowed to carry on regardless with so many police colleagues under attack?

‘The Met have put out a statement about the injured as if it is almost a matter of fact. As if this is the norm. As if this is acceptable. This is not normal. This is not acceptable.’

Mr Marsh, who ‘identifies’ as a middle aged white Englishman, is well behind the zeitgeist. It’s no good his frothing with indignation because the violence of the London carnival is now the norm, it aptly reflects the street and gang violence of the city. It is not just acceptable, such mob criminality is never discussed according to its ethnic origin, and is considered by many, including some educated middle class people, as worthy of if not approval but certainly tolerance.

This year the Notting Hill Behemoth saw the political benefit of extending its identity by the incorporation of the victims of the Grenfell Tower. Although those who suffered due to the fire mostly have nothing in common in terms of religion or ethnicity with the Afro-Caribbean cohort behind the Notting Hill Carnival, they have been co-opted into its ethos, described by Alexander Adams in his article, New Order, in the latest Jackdaw Magazine, as ‘Identarianism,’ or identity politics.

Once the fire victims were incorporated nice little rules were quickly established: No ‘selfies’ were to be taken beside the blackened shell of the Grenfell building. Revellers were to behave respectfully towards the vertical tomb, and, borrowed from patriarchal, colonialist white society, there was a minute of silence for the dead as if they were victims of a war.

This was not done from altruism. According to the rules of identity politics, empathy, even if unconscious, has potential for prejudice, misapprehension or worse – the appropriation of another’s culture. According to the ‘New Order,’ which has gradually replaced old style Marxism, each ‘subset’ culture is unique and can only be understood by other members of that subset. No outsider is entitled to speak for them. The Notting Hill organisers firstly saw the Grenfell survivors as black, a subset of the oppressed like themselves. If they believed they were a different group, their action could be justified because in the fight for social justice against the oppressive white man and his police, different subsets may join together briefly to demand reparations for the collective discrimination and oppression of the privileged white community.

The very word ‘Carnival,’ spoken with affectionate reverence by its followers, always without the determiner, signifies the difference between these disadvantaged victims and their white torturers. After co-opting Grenfell so successfully, without any questions asked, it is impossible to imagine any politician, police superintendant or elected Mayor stepping forward to say that the annual circus of mayhem and murder in west London should end, no matter how many people are killed or wounded.

Carnival’s easy acquisition of the Grenfell ‘subset’ of victims and its freedom from responsibility for crime also show that our political elite, governed as it is by shame about its own privilege so unfairly inherited, ‘privileges’ interest groups representing race and migration over and above the law.

Going to Carnival, defending it from detractors, refusing to say that it should be stopped, is now more to do with virtue signalling than any idea of having a good time on a summer’s day. To mention that it is violent and chaotic and an insult to British values would be to risk arrest. Quite amazing Mr Marsh, but that is the reality.

As Alexander Adams points out, there was a time, not so long ago, when we were appalled at Soviet agronomists who rejected Mendel’s rational theory of genetics because they were considered ‘bourgeois,’ and detested Nazi ministers who referred to science and Modern Art as ‘Jewish.’ Yet today in the USA and the UK, History, Art, Sculpture, Literature and the law of the land can be damned and flouted as ‘too white and too male.’ Yes, that is all now quite acceptable.©

3 Comments on Carnival of Crime

  1. So called “anti-racism” is now blatantly showing its true colours as “anti-white racism. What’s the end game, here? Other forms of licensed racial hatred have grown from legal disabilities and “positive” discrimination into far, far worse. Why will nobody have the guts to call time on all this? It is because anyone of any prominence would be crucified. But unless a generation of martyrs is prepared to sacrifice their worldly goods and good names then darkness will fall.

    • Perhaps many of us now see that this has gone too far and too deep and we are now well down the road to civil war. One might therefore ask what the value of personal sacrifice is at this point. After all, we have systematically bred, educated (or failed to educate), subsidised and appeased so many of our homegrown cultural, religious and political enemies. Most of the British state elites are quite transparently anti-British. Thus, to take on our enemies is first to take on the State itself. That may come but, horrifying as it sounds, it may be more effective to wait first for the fall.

      • I sympathise with the position you advocate, but I fear for how much that is good that will be lost to us as we wait, and I’m saddened by the prospect of the fall and all we shall suffer as that drama unfolds. Sad days indeed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.