Asset stripping ‘The Few’

As the battle for control of GKN, Britain’s largest and oldest engineering firm, whose products have ranged from cannonballs to Spitfires, reaches a climax (shareholders will vote on Thursday), Business Secretary Greg Clark has finally spoken. The government has been silent on the matter ever since Melrose, the corporate raider cum asset stripper, launched a £7 billion bid for GKN back in January, and hedge fund managers have piled in buying up shares in the expectation that they can make a killing. Melrose boss Simon Peckham will himself share in a £285 million bonus if the deal goes through. If the potential damage to Britain’s engineering and aerospace sector, and to our national security, of GKN being broken up and sold off were not clear enough, Tom Williams of Airbus, GKN’s largest customer, has warned that future orders would be in jeopardy if it could no longer rely on GKN’s commitment to ‘long-term investment and strategic vision’, a commitment which is only possible under stable ownership.

But at last, the Business Secretary has acted. In a letter to Melrose, he has demanded ‘binding commitments’ concerning GKN’s workforce, research and development, and pension schemes. There should be ‘a commitment to continuity of ownership and strategic investment’. And he has raised ‘concerns’ over national security given GKN’s role in supplying the UK armed forces. Melrose has been only too happy to oblige. Mr Peckham has promised a range of commitments – he will not sell the aerospace division, he will keep GKN listed on the London Stock Exchange, and he will devote 2.2 per cent of sales revenues to research and development – all of that until 2023. In other words, he will be free to sell off the rest of GKN’s divisions piecemeal, and aerospace in 2023.

We have seen these worthless commitments before, most notoriously with Cadburys. But the fate of GKN seems sealed and it will join the likes of ICI, P & O Ferries, BAA, Thames Water, Powergen, Boots, O2, Jaguar, Pilkington, Cadburys and, perhaps most significantly for our future, the crucial Cambridge semiconductor and software design company ARM Holdings, which the Japanese snapped up for £23 billion in 2016.

What, then, of Mrs May’s commitment to bolster Britain’s ‘world-leading industries’ through ‘a new industrial strategy’, a strategy that would underpin our post-Brexit future as ‘a great global trading nation’? Answer: there isn’t one. It’s business as usual, which means flogging off our assets to the highest bidder with scant regard for the national interest.

None of this bodes well for Brexit. But perhaps Mrs May has other plans.[pullquote]

Enjoyed this article? Help keep us solvent by tweeting it or sending it to your Facebook. Subscriptions (paper magazine or online) from as little as £10 a year)



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

7 Comments on Asset stripping ‘The Few’

  1. Who’s saying it hasn’t been going on for decades? The interests of the City of London always trump the needs of industry. Lord Hanson, Thatcher’s favourite, was the doyen of asset strippers. But as Roger remarks, none of the parties has a clue about an industrial strategy, or ever has. And when they have tried to pick winners, the results have not been great. The Atlee government initially piled resources into the prestige projects of nuclear power and aircraft, civil and military. The technical achievements were terrific, a succession of world-beating designs, but we could never compete commercially with the Americans. As for the Wilson/Callaghan government’s National Enterprise Board, the less said the better. Think British Leyland.

  2. This twaddle makes me vomit. Britain has been sold out since Thatcher, not that anyone wants to know that. Why were all these companies sold? As with prostitution, there has to be a buyer and a seller. So, who sold out these once iconic British companies? How much did the sellers benefit? Do an article on that for a change. Wasn’t it Super Mac who made a speech years ago about “selling the family silver”? How right he was.

    • I highly recommend the James Meek book “Private Island”. In it he details the looting that went on. It is still going on as the GKN affair tells us.
      There is a level of, greed and contempt, mixed with monumental incompetence, that infests the English elite.

  3. In the context of the UK it is impossible to have an “industrial policy” on the lines of Germany, or even France. Aside from the technological ignorance of the ruling class and political elite of both major parties, there isn’t the national will to embrace the sacrifices that would be necessary.
    It probably would end up as just another fiasco like the groundnuts scheme, or Harold Wilson’s plan to energize the British economy “in the white heat of technological revolution”.
    Given that Britain today has no identity as a country, and no common culture. A situation that is only going to worsen as native white Britons become an aging minority in a geographical space rapidly turning into a 3rd world dump.
    So the fate of GKN is really irrelevant. For Britain the course is set and the wheel is lashed, catastrophe is just ahead.